Arsenal had a tough weekend, losing 1-0 to Newcastle. The only positive aspect of last weekend was that Manchester City also suffered a loss, as Bournemouth defeated them 2-1. Despite this, numerous interpretations emerged from the weekend’s outcome.
One major observation was that some of Arsenal’s transfer activities last summer were misguided.
The Gunners made a mistake by allowing Emile Smith Rowe, Reiss Nelson, Eddie Nketiah, and Fabio Vieira to leave, only to sign Raheem Sterling, who has yet to demonstrate his class, and Mikel Merino, who demonstrated against Newcastle that he lacked creativity in the final third.
Without Martin Odegaard, Arsenal’s attacking play is hopeless, lacking the ability to execute attacking moves that would provide the attackers with numerous opportunities to score.
It’s intriguing to note that Emile Smith Rowe, who would have been the perfect player to rely on during Odegaard’s absence, has been excelling with his new club.
Until last season, injuries had hindered Smith Rowe’s efforts to re-establish himself at the Emirates Stadium, disrupting his momentum since his breakout season in 2021-22, during which he scored 10 goals and provided 2 assists in 33 games. Arsenal decided to let him go in the summer; he joined Fulham.
At Fulham, Smith Rowe has contributed to 4 goals with his 2 goals and 2 assists in 9 games, demonstrating a return to his peak performance. Looking at Leandro Trossard’s statistics, he has only 2 goals in 10 games. Plus, as per FBREF, the Belgian only manages a mere 0.18 goal-creating actions per 90 in the PL, while Smith Rowe excels with 0.72. You can’t help but feel that Smith Rowe would have been a better option in this run without Odegaard.
In Arsenal’s defeat to Newcastle, the Gunners demonstrated a lack of attacking intent, evidently lacking a creative player in their midfield.
Arsenal requires an additional creative-minded midfielder, and Antoine Semenyo from Bournemouth is a suitable transfer target. Ethan Nwaneri also needs to significantly step up and challenge Arteta with his performance on the training pitch, as many believe he can play a role in the team.
Ultimately, the summer transfer window weakened our attack – among the attacking players, perhaps Emile Smith Rowe shouldn’t have left – and we need to see Edu and Arteta make up for that when the transfer window opens.
What do you think?
Peter Rix
ADMIN COMMENT
So here are some simple rules which I must insist commenters follow….
You agree not to give any personal abuse to other Arsenal fans. Everyone is allowed to hold their own opinions even if you disagree with them. It COSTS NOTHING TO BE POLITE TO OTHER ARSENAL FANS.
CALLING ALL ARSENAL FANS! Anyone who would like to contribute an Article or Video opinion piece on JustArsenal, please contact us through this link…
I think there were a couple things involved in the decision, and probably more we are not aware of.
The obvious ones are that Arteta did not consider ESR to be part of his plans, as was evident with leaving him out of selections when he was fully fit.
Secondly, we had to begin balancing the books after the massive spending of the last 5 years. ESR and Nketiah are both academy players and pure profit in terms of transfers, so they were always on the short list.
We should have added Vieira to the list, as he has been far behind ESR in terms of productivity, and likely will not reach his potential with Arsenal in the PL. Vieira lacks the physic, aggressiveness, and pace for the midfield role Arteta sees him playing.
Time to admit this, and look to move Vieira out in the Summer when he returns from loan.
History suggested ESR was unlikely to stay fit (which might still be the case, but hopefully he has overcome those issues), and ESR might have felt it was too much of a risk to stay, because odegaard rarely got injured before, so the chances were he’d be sat on the bench all season again – he needs to play to build his reputation and enjoy his career.
I don’t know if arteta was happy enough that trossard or havertz or merino could cover adequately for odegaard if needed, but it really looks like we didn’t have a good plan for the injury.
An article on JA yesterday asked: “Why are we still looking back at a transfer window that’s in the past!!” Now there’s one today that does just that!
There’s no point in “what ifs” as ESR was sold and, unfortunately, Arsenal didn’t see the need, or weren’t able, to bring in a striker during the ten-week summer window. However, we shouldn’t pretend that we didn’t need one because, if we’re honest, we did – and do now.